Thank you Kate. I know you're not Jewish so your support means even more to us. I was a big Bob Moran fan during the scamdemic but this display of his is beyond the pale. Like you and Norman Fenton, I'm sick to my stomach about the anti-semitism among so many in the health freedom movement. How can they be so awake and yet so asleep at the same time?
Thank you for your courage Kate. You are one of the few beacons able to still show decency and critical thought. I apologise for the creatures who chose to use it to advance their own Antisemitic bloody agenda. I know they lack the decency or capacity to ever reflect on their choice to shed their humanity so easily for a hateful mob.
... I do not see this cartoon as directed against Jews, but showing the irony that the very same Israeli leadership (represented by Netanyahu) who decries Hamas atrocities in killing little children and babies is also doing the very same in the continual indiscriminate bombing of Gaza. Don’t hurt the messenger.The reference is almost ‘Goya - esque’ (Saturn devouring his son).
The only thing Israel is guilty of is winning wars they didn't start. That's what is so intolerable to the anti-semites. The very thought of a successful Jew inspires nothing but rage and envy in loser bigots whose existence is predicated upon nursing grievances and impotently plotting destruction rather than doing anything remotely productive or creative.
dude, when they first got there.... in someone else's land coz they'd scarpered 2000 years ago.... they kicked the landowners out. This has nothing to do with anti-semitism but truth and justice and fairness. How would you feel?
The Jews always had a presence in what can legitimately be called their homeland and had been migrating to the area and buying land legally for years prior, then were driven there as refugees as the only hope of refuge from Europe and all surrounding Arab states, then when the proposal to form a state and share with the Arabs came, they accepted a much smaller territory than originally proposed, letting the Arabs have the by far largest portion, but the Arabs decided the Jews deserved nothing and four countries declared war and lost, getting even less territory. Despite this, Arabs who had been ‘driven’ out actually had the option of staying, and many did, now constituting a significant portion of the Israeli population. The ones who left had been duped by the Arab countries into thinking they would be on the winning team, and were then abandoned when they lost. It’s the sad fate of the Palestinians. Still rejected wholesale by their former compatriots and fellow religionists. Probably out of equal parts shame and contempt. Since then they have been persistently prosecuting a grievance that they are responsible for by rejecting diplomacy in favour of war. That’s my broad understanding of the history. I do not abide the oppressor/oppressed view of the situation. You do realize in the first decade of Israel’s existence, it was the darling of the left with its socialistic kibbutz culture, no one at all in the West then considering it illegitimate in any way, in fact it was a beacon for the future, until that is, it was compelled to develop and become strong enough to defend itself from constant attacks from neighbours. As soon as they were strong, they became the bad guy. No one gave a damn about the ‘injustice’ to Palestinians before then.
Thanks for the insight. The only thing that is relevant is destruction of the Dome of the Rock and rebuilding the Temple. Don't know what happens to the dome. I feel the time is near.
To be fair/objective - your attempt at 'character assassination' of somebody who drew a cartoon that offended you, could not be more obvious. It's pure puerility, but I digress.
Both Zionists/Bolsheviks are disgustingly inhuman psychopaths drunk on the inherently sociopathic delusion of Religion/Statism. Moreover, anyone seriously using the term 'antisemitism' is a simple minded "useful-idiot" of Language.
"Semitism" is a Linguistic reference not Anthropological/biological! It refers to a group - the Semitic Group, of Languages; Hebrew, Arabic, Aramaic, Coptic Egyptian, etc. All of the Languages spoken by people of the Levant. Ergo anyone speaking any of these Languages 'speaks' a Semitic Language, but that doesn't make them Semites anymore than everyone who speaks a Germanic Language is a German or anyone speaking an'Indo European Language is an 'Indo European.' Linguistic references refer to LANGUAGE not Anthropology. Opinion is moot-point. Language operates upon immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic not opinion.
Arabs/Hamas are semites ffs. How can any intelligent adult be so full of gullible puerility with regard to Language? Falling for the sophistry of "antisemitism" is genuinely unintelligent understanding of Language.
For example - Yiddish is the native Language of European Jews, Yiddish is a Germanic Language, not Semitic. European Jews are NOT Semites! Nor are they necessarily German. In fact any Jew who does not speak Hebrew is NOT a Semite! Opinion is moot-point.
The term 'antisemitism' is truly - dimwit - Bernaysian public relations propaganda. It's low IQ sophistry, designed to fool the plebs/pagans/unchosen into being Gaslighting Bigots for Judaism.
Only halfwits of Language who are clueless of the immutable axioms of Logic upon which Language operate, fall for such inherently fallacious, opinion-pimping puerility, and linguistic slight-of-hand. The term serves no other purpose than the absolutely BIGOTED Gaslighting of anyone critical of Judaism and that is axiomatic ffs. Opinion is moot-point!
Humanity is nearly one quarter century into the 21st century... The Human Genome has been fully mapped and sequenced. We know the genetic truth about all Human Beings. Jews are Caucasian! Judaism is a Religion not a race. It's beyond time to fight back against the mental-illness of Statism, government corruption, coercion, and force, Religion and all other institutions of false authority, all contrived 'Bernaysian' propaganda, and public relations stupidity, collectivism, politics, adult puerility, superstition, metaphysical mumbo-jumbo, and supernatural fantasy. They're all inherently untrustworthy, unintelligent, unproductive, destructive, deceptive, and absolutely delusional. They all represent contrived cognitive dysfunction.
Belief - is just a polite word for delusion!
Moreover, Government/Religion are genuinely the domain of those incapable of being an intelligent, independent, Free-thinking, cooperative, constructive, and genuinely considerate Human Being - without being told what to do. If you need Religion and/or Government to be a good person/citizen than you're an inherently 'bad' person looking for a place to safely hide guilt, while lying to yourself and finding validation of your self-myth from your collectivist gang.
Unless you served in the Military in Psychological Operations/Civil Affairs, or have the appropriate education in Psychological Operations/Civil Affairs - which you clearly don't, you are woefully blind to the truth about the world in regards to war, religion, academia, business, and government. It's all a matter of history, and the right security clearance.
Me, IDGAF. I have a military education in Psychological Operations. I know first hand that the religious, especially the Theocratic, are predominantly gullible and easily manipulated. IDGAF who they are! Anyone an apologist of Religious dogma and supernatural nonsense is a useful idiot of Religion plain & simple. Same goes for statism - Theocratic or not.
To be fair - You are just as much a useful idiot as the cartoonist you accuse. If it wasn't for you, I wouldn't even know who he is, or ever see his stupid cartoon. You both demonstrate puerility, while believing yourself Righteous, but that's how self-myth works. At least a cartoonist is paid for their propaganda. The Religious pay for the yoke around their neck and are expected to spread the 'gospel' for free.
Let me ask you - what proof do you have that the State of Israel is not behind the incidents of Oct 7? It's far more likely that they are, than that they are not, but what would you know of these things... You've never been anywhere near those trenches of warfare. You're just another useful idiot civilian, pimping feckless opinions like every other political tool with their head ten miles up their own ass, just so they can get the true scent of their own farts. Smug is smug - Right or Left.
FTR - Statism/Politics is the Science of fraud, and all politicians are the Professor's. So I am genuinely curious, does your breath smell like Statist boot-polish?
I thought that you're on the winning side of Freedom, and not the current paradigm of oppressive civilization - Zionism vs Bolshevism. As you demonstrate here, apparently, you're a Zionist. That makes you a Statist. That makes you State first - Freedom last 'uniparty' useful idiot.
Neither Zionism, nor Bolshevism, or any other form of Statism has the power, to render, any of it's practitioners bullet proof and/or above the Law. They're all silly little obsequious servile lickspittle's on a sinking ship without anything to save them.
The axiomatic Logically certain Truth is - 'all' political ideology is inherently irrational, unintelligent, exploitive, and oppressive. There is no such thing as good Government. No Government is good Government.
We the Free are going to watch all of the useful idiots of Statism brutalize, bully, and Gaslight each other as the ship slowly sinks, and they all drown in their silly statist fantasies. They will all be good fertilizer for the earth and forgotten forever in the name of Freedom.
This Zionism vs Bolshevism paradigm of civilization has come to its inevitable end after 2000 years. DEATH TO ALL TYRANTS... and their lickspittles too.
Rather long, so this is being posted in two parts.
Part 1:
"...Moreover, anyone seriously using the term 'antisemitism' is a simple minded "useful-idiot" of Language."
(One cannot be a useful idiot of language because language has no will of its own. It is a tool used by people; this is like saying someone is a useful idiot of a hammer or a knife. It is meaningless bluster. Although I guess it demonstrates even useful idiots can use tools.)
""Semitism" is a Linguistic reference ... an'Indo European Language is an 'Indo European.'"
(You seem to be confusing your groupings here. Indo European is a language family that encompasses the other languages you have listed. You also seem to be confused by terminology when it comes to “Semitic”:
“The Coptic Language is the fourth and last step of evolution of the Ancient Egyptian language, ... Coptic, just as Ancient Egyptian, is a Hamito-semitic language, similar to many North African languages and with few similarities to semitic languages..”
“Opinion is moot-point. Language operates upon immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic not opinion.”
(Challenge: Re-write this sentence so that it has the same meaning, but uses different words. I do not believe these terms that are taken from mathematics can be applied to linguistics in the way you seem to be trying to do here. To put it in simpler terms, I think what you have written here is meaningless gibberish trying to sound intelligent.
“Propositional calculus is a branch of logic. It is also called propositional logic, ...
Unlike first-order logic, propositional logic does not deal with non-logical objects, predicates about them, or quantifiers. ...”
"Arabs/Hamas are semites ffs. How can any intelligent adult be so full of gullible puerility with regard to Language? Falling for the sophistry of "antisemitism" is genuinely unintelligent understanding of Language.
...any Jew who does not speak Hebrew is NOT a Semite! ...
The term 'antisemitism' is truly - dimwit - Bernaysian public relations propaganda. ... .
Only halfwits of Language ... The term serves no other purpose than the absolutely BIGOTED Gaslighting of anyone critical of Judaism and that is axiomatic ffs..."
(It is not “axiomatic” that recognising anti-semitism as a genuine thing describing the targeting of Jewish people for attack purely on the basis of their Jewishness is something only done by “halfwits of Language”. It is the widely accepted dictionary definition of anti-semitism.
It is not “axiomatic” that the sole purpose of using the term anti-semitic is to 'gaslight' anyone critical of Judaism. Misusing big words in an obfuscatory way does not make you an intellectual. And writing “ffs” after your obfuscation in an attempt to force people to accept your argument as self evident through the mechanism of ridicule is not particularly big or clever either.
“... A statement that is axiomatic, therefore, is one against which few people would argue.”
"Humanity is nearly one quarter century into the 21st century... The Human Genome has been fully mapped and sequenced. We know the genetic truth about all Human Beings. Jews are Caucasian! Judaism is a Religion not a race."
(“Jews are Caucasian!” Pure and simple? Really? Someone should tell the Falasha Jews then. Your assertion is simply not true. As someone who appears to be claiming familiarity with the human genome in all its variability, you should know this. Jewish people have been shown to have Middle eastern genetic ancestry. The majority of the Jewish population of Israel is derived from Middle Eastern origins, not least because large Jewish communities in several Middle Eastern countries were driven out by the Arab majority in the aftermath of WWII. See:
The European descended population is a minority, partly because the Nazis were so thorough in their extermination of that group as a consequence of the profoundly anti-Semitic programme they implemented. I guess you regard this programme as “axiomatically” non-existent from what you write.
Judaism is a religion, but to attempt to separate it from the Jewish people by denying the chief mechanism by which one becomes Jewish via the maternal line, by denying them their ethnicity and their ancient culture is disingenuous to say the least.
Now I get the whole self-entitled, 'Karen' attitude, and all of the ridiculous Jew Holy-book religious psycho-babble non sequitur of my Logically certain Propositional Statements... You're British! It's no wonder that you're such a demonstrably self-entitled, arrogantly-ignorant 'Karen'.
By the by, criticising Netanyahu and the Israeli government for their handling of the current crisis is not anti-Semitic. Drawing a cartoon of Netanyahu eating blood spattered babies with the word 'Kosher' above his head is because it recalls the ancient libel thrown at Jews, that they killed Christian babies and used the blood to make the Passover matzos.
Kosher is the word used to describe what is religiously acceptable in Judaism and required of an observant Jew. It is not a political term. The way it has been used in Bob's cartoon, whether Bob realises it or not, suggests it is religiously acceptable for Jewish people to kill and eat the babies of non Jews, and that it is even a requirement for an observant Jew.
That is simply a lie. If you have real evidence (and no, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” is not real evidence) from the Jewish holy text, produce it. I would be very curious to see it, since it is also a text considered holy by Christians, and this claim is not made about them.
By way of contrast: imagine Bob had produced the same cartoon, but one which replaced Netanyahu with the senior leadership of Hamas currently living in 5 star luxury in Qatar, and with the leadership of Iran replacing Sunak (Biden can remain since he appears to be assisting both sides), then the word “Halal” was written above their heads. It is not hard to imagine the outrage that would have followed that, and how considerably more dangerous for Bob's personal safety it would have been.
"It's beyond time to fight back against the mental-illness of Statism, government corruption, coercion, and force, Religion and all other institutions of false authority ....
Belief - is just a polite word for delusion!"
(Sorry, all we have are beliefs. Nothing else. Even the scientific endeavour recognises that. It is always possible that some future discovery will overturn everything you think you know is true beyond all doubt. Some beliefs are closer to reality than others, but that is as good as it gets.)
"Moreover, Government/Religion are genuinely the domain of those incapable of being an intelligent, independent, Free-thinking, cooperative, constructive, and genuinely considerate Human Being - without being told what to do. If you need Religion and/or Government to be a good person/citizen than you're an inherently 'bad' person looking for a place to safely hide guilt ..."
(And from where does your idea of goodness (I note you have left that undefined) derive? You are listing words which sound good without considering whether we have shared ideas which cut across different cultures regarding what it means to be those things, and from where we got those concepts.)
"Unless you served in the Military in Psychological Operations/Civil Affairs, or have the appropriate education in Psychological Operations/Civil Affair ... you are woefully blind to the truth about the world in regards to war, ...
Me, IDGAF. I have a military education in Psychological Operations. I know first hand that the religious, especially the Theocratic, are predominantly gullible and easily manipulated. ...."
(This is so funny. So, according to you, only those trained in the military in psychological operations can see 'the truth', and that just happens to be your background. Lucky old you. I must just accept your word salad because you can see the truth, whereas I am “woefully blind”. Love it!)
"To be fair - You are just as much a useful idiot as the cartoonist you accuse. If it wasn't for you, I wouldn't even know who he is, or ever see his stupid cartoon. You both demonstrate puerility, while believing yourself Righteous,...."
(I am not altogether sure that the author of this substack or Bob do believe themselves to be “Righteous”. They are just describing the world as they see it. You sure seem to think that of yourself though. At least, that is the impression you give. I think the pot needs a colour check, so to speak.)
"Let me ask you - what proof do you have that the State of Israel is not behind the incidents of Oct 7? It's far more likely that they are, than that they are not, but what would you know of these things... You've never been anywhere near those trenches of warfare. ..."
(You ask for proof that Israel is not behind the attacks on 7th October (nice attempt to downplay the severity by calling them 'incidents' by the way), which is kind of funny given your love of logic as stated above. Here, you stray close to a logical fallacy, whereby you assume your proposition is true (“Israel is responsible for the attacks on 7th October”) because the writer has not provided evidence that it is false in her article. I would suggest that the fact Hamas recorded what they did and uploaded it onto the internet, plus the fact that the leadership of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank praised Hamas for what they did, and that Hamas said they wished to repeat it until there were no Jews left tends to indicate where responsibility for the atrocities lies.)
"FTR ...
I thought that you're on the winning side of Freedom, and not the current paradigm of oppressive civilization - Zionism vs Bolshevism. As you demonstrate here, apparently, you're a Zionist. That makes you a Statist. That makes you State first - Freedom last 'uniparty' useful idiot."
(You really should define your terms. What do you think of as freedom, and why do you separate it from civilization, which you describe as oppressive? I wonder how free you would feel if you were old, or frail, or disabled, or very young, in a world without any civilization at all, where 'might is right' gets to rule. So much for being a considerate human being. Or perhaps you share with Rousseau the idea that humanity is really made up of 'noble savages', so all would be well just like that. A strange view for a military man to subscribe to, I must say.)
"Neither Zionism, nor Bolshevism, or any other form of Statism has the power, to render, any of it's practitioners bullet proof and/or above the Law. ...
This Zionism vs Bolshevism paradigm of civilization has come to its inevitable end after 2000 years. DEATH TO ALL TYRANTS... and their lickspittles too."
(Zionism vs Bolshevism paradigm (or pattern) of civilization?! What does that even mean? 2000 years old?!? I'm sure Lenin would be surprised to learn Bolshevism pre-dated him by 1,900 years. What an inaccurate and limited view of the last 2,000 years. No Christianity; no Islam. No Christianity vs Islam; no China, no India etc. etc. Just a narrow little microscopic view of the world that doesn't even focus properly.)
"DE OPPRESSOR LIBER"
(De oppresso liber is the motto of the United States Army Special Forces, which is traditionally believed to mean "to free from oppression" or "to liberate the oppressed" in Latin.013 However, a translation of "to free from oppression" would be "de oppressione liberare." ”
It's clear from what you have written, and how you have written it, that you do not have any education in Propositional/Predicate Logic. It is AXIOMATIC of your demonstrably low IQ, middle-school level writing skills.
FTR - All Language operates upon immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic - whether you understand them or not. As your writing demonstrates - you clearly don't. You can take your feeble, religious Logical fallacies, and delusions, and you can choke-to-death on them for all I care.
Do NOT project any of your dimwit delusions or mental-illness into ANYTHING I have written. What I have said is clearly written in Logically certain Propositional Statements…. Anything that you IMAGINE - SpongeBob SquarePants, that is not written by me, originated within YOUR sick, gaslighting mind, you feeble-minded psychopath.
Take your inherently fallacious meathead opinions, and your low IQ Logical fallacies of Language, and shove them ten miles up your ass - where your head clearly resides, sniffing your bigoted smugness.
I am not interested in wasting my time reading anything you have to say, if you cannot write intelligent, Logically certain Propositional Statements, without predicate ambiguity, Logical fallacy, gaslighting projection, bigotry, or sophistry.
I don't remember asking you a Goddamn thing! You're the nincompoop who got all butthurt after seeing my comment and tried to assert some bizarre non sequitur!
You weirdo - it's your bigoted gaslighting pejoratives, vapid Logical fallacies, and pseudo intellectual nonsense of Logic that make you s psychopath - Karen
You are by definition, the one with an 'axiomatic' anger issue - you're the one who got butthurt not me- Karen. You're the one with delusions of grandeur that you're somehow entitled to "explanation", of your own non sequitur!
Get an education Karen, your imagination of one only proves your arrogant-ignorance. I don't owe you an explanation of anything! The only thing I owe 'you' is my abject contempt! Karen!
For the record - Logically certain Propositional Statements are perfect arguments. Arrogant ignoramus!
First off - Non sequitur is Logical fallacy. Etymology has fuck-all to do with anything I clearly stated in Propositional Statements!
A Propositional Statement is a Logically certain argument you pathetically delusional pseudo intellectual. "Usage" isn't a fucking Argument! Clearly you're operating on IMAGINATION - Sponge Bob SquarePants.
Silly false comparison/dichotomy, and syllogistic fallacy of Language, are demonstrable Logical fallacy, even if you're to ignorant to comprehend your own stupidity.
FTR SFB - NO, Homosexuals are not “Gay” they're 'Homosexual' ffs - meaning they are ‘sexually attracted to the same sex’. That's Etymology, meathead! The word “Gay” is an example of Bernaysian 'appropriation' of Language. The word “Gay” is SLANG ffs! More specifically it is ‘English’ slang, just like the word “fag” is English slang for a cigarette, as the actual word ‘faggot’ is an English word for a bundle of sticks used to start a fire! That's Etymology ffs!
Moreover, Etymology does not change Logic you arrogantly-ignorant fool! A ‘Linguistic’ reference does not change to an ‘Anthropological’ reference because “Etymology”!
Slang is the vernacular of stupidity, and sciolism is the standard of ignorance in which it exists!
Etymology does not mean the original PROPOSITIONAL definition of a word changes, you halfwit. Language operates on 'immutable' axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic, whether you're capable of comprehending or not.
Language does not operate on opinion! Etymology is a system of LOGIC ffs!
What is demonstrably "stupid" are your arrogantly-ignorant pseudo intellectual comments. That much is axiomatic. Does your breath smell like boot-polish as well?
Unfortunately, this take a total miss. Picking sides undermines the very nature of free speech and what constitutes “art” -- all of it will be received from the level of awareness you’re at and how you’ve reconciled your own internal polarity. 👎🏻
Thank you Kate. I know you're not Jewish so your support means even more to us. I was a big Bob Moran fan during the scamdemic but this display of his is beyond the pale. Like you and Norman Fenton, I'm sick to my stomach about the anti-semitism among so many in the health freedom movement. How can they be so awake and yet so asleep at the same time?
Thank you for your courage Kate. You are one of the few beacons able to still show decency and critical thought. I apologise for the creatures who chose to use it to advance their own Antisemitic bloody agenda. I know they lack the decency or capacity to ever reflect on their choice to shed their humanity so easily for a hateful mob.
... I do not see this cartoon as directed against Jews, but showing the irony that the very same Israeli leadership (represented by Netanyahu) who decries Hamas atrocities in killing little children and babies is also doing the very same in the continual indiscriminate bombing of Gaza. Don’t hurt the messenger.The reference is almost ‘Goya - esque’ (Saturn devouring his son).
You remember what happened to those who tried?
Oh no, you're another one......sad
I think it's a brilliant cartoon.
Over the years Israel have been a far greater terrorist than their imprisoned/victimized palestinians... starting from their first nakba in 1948.
If us unvaccinated were attacked and had our rights taken away and imprisoned..... would you just lie down and take it?
The only thing Israel is guilty of is winning wars they didn't start. That's what is so intolerable to the anti-semites. The very thought of a successful Jew inspires nothing but rage and envy in loser bigots whose existence is predicated upon nursing grievances and impotently plotting destruction rather than doing anything remotely productive or creative.
dude, when they first got there.... in someone else's land coz they'd scarpered 2000 years ago.... they kicked the landowners out. This has nothing to do with anti-semitism but truth and justice and fairness. How would you feel?
The Jews always had a presence in what can legitimately be called their homeland and had been migrating to the area and buying land legally for years prior, then were driven there as refugees as the only hope of refuge from Europe and all surrounding Arab states, then when the proposal to form a state and share with the Arabs came, they accepted a much smaller territory than originally proposed, letting the Arabs have the by far largest portion, but the Arabs decided the Jews deserved nothing and four countries declared war and lost, getting even less territory. Despite this, Arabs who had been ‘driven’ out actually had the option of staying, and many did, now constituting a significant portion of the Israeli population. The ones who left had been duped by the Arab countries into thinking they would be on the winning team, and were then abandoned when they lost. It’s the sad fate of the Palestinians. Still rejected wholesale by their former compatriots and fellow religionists. Probably out of equal parts shame and contempt. Since then they have been persistently prosecuting a grievance that they are responsible for by rejecting diplomacy in favour of war. That’s my broad understanding of the history. I do not abide the oppressor/oppressed view of the situation. You do realize in the first decade of Israel’s existence, it was the darling of the left with its socialistic kibbutz culture, no one at all in the West then considering it illegitimate in any way, in fact it was a beacon for the future, until that is, it was compelled to develop and become strong enough to defend itself from constant attacks from neighbours. As soon as they were strong, they became the bad guy. No one gave a damn about the ‘injustice’ to Palestinians before then.
Succinct and accurate, as far as I have discovered.
Thanks, good to hear, since I've been on quite a learning curve around ME history in recent months.
Thanks for the insight. The only thing that is relevant is destruction of the Dome of the Rock and rebuilding the Temple. Don't know what happens to the dome. I feel the time is near.
To be fair/objective - your attempt at 'character assassination' of somebody who drew a cartoon that offended you, could not be more obvious. It's pure puerility, but I digress.
Both Zionists/Bolsheviks are disgustingly inhuman psychopaths drunk on the inherently sociopathic delusion of Religion/Statism. Moreover, anyone seriously using the term 'antisemitism' is a simple minded "useful-idiot" of Language.
"Semitism" is a Linguistic reference not Anthropological/biological! It refers to a group - the Semitic Group, of Languages; Hebrew, Arabic, Aramaic, Coptic Egyptian, etc. All of the Languages spoken by people of the Levant. Ergo anyone speaking any of these Languages 'speaks' a Semitic Language, but that doesn't make them Semites anymore than everyone who speaks a Germanic Language is a German or anyone speaking an'Indo European Language is an 'Indo European.' Linguistic references refer to LANGUAGE not Anthropology. Opinion is moot-point. Language operates upon immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic not opinion.
Arabs/Hamas are semites ffs. How can any intelligent adult be so full of gullible puerility with regard to Language? Falling for the sophistry of "antisemitism" is genuinely unintelligent understanding of Language.
For example - Yiddish is the native Language of European Jews, Yiddish is a Germanic Language, not Semitic. European Jews are NOT Semites! Nor are they necessarily German. In fact any Jew who does not speak Hebrew is NOT a Semite! Opinion is moot-point.
The term 'antisemitism' is truly - dimwit - Bernaysian public relations propaganda. It's low IQ sophistry, designed to fool the plebs/pagans/unchosen into being Gaslighting Bigots for Judaism.
Only halfwits of Language who are clueless of the immutable axioms of Logic upon which Language operate, fall for such inherently fallacious, opinion-pimping puerility, and linguistic slight-of-hand. The term serves no other purpose than the absolutely BIGOTED Gaslighting of anyone critical of Judaism and that is axiomatic ffs. Opinion is moot-point!
Humanity is nearly one quarter century into the 21st century... The Human Genome has been fully mapped and sequenced. We know the genetic truth about all Human Beings. Jews are Caucasian! Judaism is a Religion not a race. It's beyond time to fight back against the mental-illness of Statism, government corruption, coercion, and force, Religion and all other institutions of false authority, all contrived 'Bernaysian' propaganda, and public relations stupidity, collectivism, politics, adult puerility, superstition, metaphysical mumbo-jumbo, and supernatural fantasy. They're all inherently untrustworthy, unintelligent, unproductive, destructive, deceptive, and absolutely delusional. They all represent contrived cognitive dysfunction.
Belief - is just a polite word for delusion!
Moreover, Government/Religion are genuinely the domain of those incapable of being an intelligent, independent, Free-thinking, cooperative, constructive, and genuinely considerate Human Being - without being told what to do. If you need Religion and/or Government to be a good person/citizen than you're an inherently 'bad' person looking for a place to safely hide guilt, while lying to yourself and finding validation of your self-myth from your collectivist gang.
Unless you served in the Military in Psychological Operations/Civil Affairs, or have the appropriate education in Psychological Operations/Civil Affairs - which you clearly don't, you are woefully blind to the truth about the world in regards to war, religion, academia, business, and government. It's all a matter of history, and the right security clearance.
Me, IDGAF. I have a military education in Psychological Operations. I know first hand that the religious, especially the Theocratic, are predominantly gullible and easily manipulated. IDGAF who they are! Anyone an apologist of Religious dogma and supernatural nonsense is a useful idiot of Religion plain & simple. Same goes for statism - Theocratic or not.
To be fair - You are just as much a useful idiot as the cartoonist you accuse. If it wasn't for you, I wouldn't even know who he is, or ever see his stupid cartoon. You both demonstrate puerility, while believing yourself Righteous, but that's how self-myth works. At least a cartoonist is paid for their propaganda. The Religious pay for the yoke around their neck and are expected to spread the 'gospel' for free.
Let me ask you - what proof do you have that the State of Israel is not behind the incidents of Oct 7? It's far more likely that they are, than that they are not, but what would you know of these things... You've never been anywhere near those trenches of warfare. You're just another useful idiot civilian, pimping feckless opinions like every other political tool with their head ten miles up their own ass, just so they can get the true scent of their own farts. Smug is smug - Right or Left.
FTR - Statism/Politics is the Science of fraud, and all politicians are the Professor's. So I am genuinely curious, does your breath smell like Statist boot-polish?
I thought that you're on the winning side of Freedom, and not the current paradigm of oppressive civilization - Zionism vs Bolshevism. As you demonstrate here, apparently, you're a Zionist. That makes you a Statist. That makes you State first - Freedom last 'uniparty' useful idiot.
Neither Zionism, nor Bolshevism, or any other form of Statism has the power, to render, any of it's practitioners bullet proof and/or above the Law. They're all silly little obsequious servile lickspittle's on a sinking ship without anything to save them.
The axiomatic Logically certain Truth is - 'all' political ideology is inherently irrational, unintelligent, exploitive, and oppressive. There is no such thing as good Government. No Government is good Government.
We the Free are going to watch all of the useful idiots of Statism brutalize, bully, and Gaslight each other as the ship slowly sinks, and they all drown in their silly statist fantasies. They will all be good fertilizer for the earth and forgotten forever in the name of Freedom.
This Zionism vs Bolshevism paradigm of civilization has come to its inevitable end after 2000 years. DEATH TO ALL TYRANTS... and their lickspittles too.
DE OPPRESSOR LIBER
AMEN! I think you've nailed the whole situation.
☺️ Cheers! Your objectivity is much appreciated 💪🧠
As is yours!
Rather long, so this is being posted in two parts.
Part 1:
"...Moreover, anyone seriously using the term 'antisemitism' is a simple minded "useful-idiot" of Language."
(One cannot be a useful idiot of language because language has no will of its own. It is a tool used by people; this is like saying someone is a useful idiot of a hammer or a knife. It is meaningless bluster. Although I guess it demonstrates even useful idiots can use tools.)
""Semitism" is a Linguistic reference ... an'Indo European Language is an 'Indo European.'"
(You seem to be confusing your groupings here. Indo European is a language family that encompasses the other languages you have listed. You also seem to be confused by terminology when it comes to “Semitic”:
“The Coptic Language is the fourth and last step of evolution of the Ancient Egyptian language, ... Coptic, just as Ancient Egyptian, is a Hamito-semitic language, similar to many North African languages and with few similarities to semitic languages..”
https://saintmarkhouston.org/smh/new/about/language/)
“Opinion is moot-point. Language operates upon immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic not opinion.”
(Challenge: Re-write this sentence so that it has the same meaning, but uses different words. I do not believe these terms that are taken from mathematics can be applied to linguistics in the way you seem to be trying to do here. To put it in simpler terms, I think what you have written here is meaningless gibberish trying to sound intelligent.
“Propositional calculus is a branch of logic. It is also called propositional logic, ...
Unlike first-order logic, propositional logic does not deal with non-logical objects, predicates about them, or quantifiers. ...”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus)
"Arabs/Hamas are semites ffs. How can any intelligent adult be so full of gullible puerility with regard to Language? Falling for the sophistry of "antisemitism" is genuinely unintelligent understanding of Language.
...any Jew who does not speak Hebrew is NOT a Semite! ...
The term 'antisemitism' is truly - dimwit - Bernaysian public relations propaganda. ... .
Only halfwits of Language ... The term serves no other purpose than the absolutely BIGOTED Gaslighting of anyone critical of Judaism and that is axiomatic ffs..."
(It is not “axiomatic” that recognising anti-semitism as a genuine thing describing the targeting of Jewish people for attack purely on the basis of their Jewishness is something only done by “halfwits of Language”. It is the widely accepted dictionary definition of anti-semitism.
It is not “axiomatic” that the sole purpose of using the term anti-semitic is to 'gaslight' anyone critical of Judaism. Misusing big words in an obfuscatory way does not make you an intellectual. And writing “ffs” after your obfuscation in an attempt to force people to accept your argument as self evident through the mechanism of ridicule is not particularly big or clever either.
“... A statement that is axiomatic, therefore, is one against which few people would argue.”
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/axiomatic)
"Humanity is nearly one quarter century into the 21st century... The Human Genome has been fully mapped and sequenced. We know the genetic truth about all Human Beings. Jews are Caucasian! Judaism is a Religion not a race."
(“Jews are Caucasian!” Pure and simple? Really? Someone should tell the Falasha Jews then. Your assertion is simply not true. As someone who appears to be claiming familiarity with the human genome in all its variability, you should know this. Jewish people have been shown to have Middle eastern genetic ancestry. The majority of the Jewish population of Israel is derived from Middle Eastern origins, not least because large Jewish communities in several Middle Eastern countries were driven out by the Arab majority in the aftermath of WWII. See:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23052947/
and
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3032072/
and
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20531471/
The European descended population is a minority, partly because the Nazis were so thorough in their extermination of that group as a consequence of the profoundly anti-Semitic programme they implemented. I guess you regard this programme as “axiomatically” non-existent from what you write.
Judaism is a religion, but to attempt to separate it from the Jewish people by denying the chief mechanism by which one becomes Jewish via the maternal line, by denying them their ethnicity and their ancient culture is disingenuous to say the least.
Aside from being woefully pathetic, your pseudo intellectualism is fucking hilarious.
As I said, you are funny : )
Now I get the whole self-entitled, 'Karen' attitude, and all of the ridiculous Jew Holy-book religious psycho-babble non sequitur of my Logically certain Propositional Statements... You're British! It's no wonder that you're such a demonstrably self-entitled, arrogantly-ignorant 'Karen'.
There you go again Karen, projecting your psychological peculiarity. What part of 'go fuck yourself' is too much for your 'Karen-brain' to process?
I do not give one iota of fuck what you have to say! Go somewhere else and masturbate your feckless puerile ego.
Part 2:
By the by, criticising Netanyahu and the Israeli government for their handling of the current crisis is not anti-Semitic. Drawing a cartoon of Netanyahu eating blood spattered babies with the word 'Kosher' above his head is because it recalls the ancient libel thrown at Jews, that they killed Christian babies and used the blood to make the Passover matzos.
Kosher is the word used to describe what is religiously acceptable in Judaism and required of an observant Jew. It is not a political term. The way it has been used in Bob's cartoon, whether Bob realises it or not, suggests it is religiously acceptable for Jewish people to kill and eat the babies of non Jews, and that it is even a requirement for an observant Jew.
That is simply a lie. If you have real evidence (and no, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” is not real evidence) from the Jewish holy text, produce it. I would be very curious to see it, since it is also a text considered holy by Christians, and this claim is not made about them.
By way of contrast: imagine Bob had produced the same cartoon, but one which replaced Netanyahu with the senior leadership of Hamas currently living in 5 star luxury in Qatar, and with the leadership of Iran replacing Sunak (Biden can remain since he appears to be assisting both sides), then the word “Halal” was written above their heads. It is not hard to imagine the outrage that would have followed that, and how considerably more dangerous for Bob's personal safety it would have been.
"It's beyond time to fight back against the mental-illness of Statism, government corruption, coercion, and force, Religion and all other institutions of false authority ....
Belief - is just a polite word for delusion!"
(Sorry, all we have are beliefs. Nothing else. Even the scientific endeavour recognises that. It is always possible that some future discovery will overturn everything you think you know is true beyond all doubt. Some beliefs are closer to reality than others, but that is as good as it gets.)
"Moreover, Government/Religion are genuinely the domain of those incapable of being an intelligent, independent, Free-thinking, cooperative, constructive, and genuinely considerate Human Being - without being told what to do. If you need Religion and/or Government to be a good person/citizen than you're an inherently 'bad' person looking for a place to safely hide guilt ..."
(And from where does your idea of goodness (I note you have left that undefined) derive? You are listing words which sound good without considering whether we have shared ideas which cut across different cultures regarding what it means to be those things, and from where we got those concepts.)
"Unless you served in the Military in Psychological Operations/Civil Affairs, or have the appropriate education in Psychological Operations/Civil Affair ... you are woefully blind to the truth about the world in regards to war, ...
Me, IDGAF. I have a military education in Psychological Operations. I know first hand that the religious, especially the Theocratic, are predominantly gullible and easily manipulated. ...."
(This is so funny. So, according to you, only those trained in the military in psychological operations can see 'the truth', and that just happens to be your background. Lucky old you. I must just accept your word salad because you can see the truth, whereas I am “woefully blind”. Love it!)
"To be fair - You are just as much a useful idiot as the cartoonist you accuse. If it wasn't for you, I wouldn't even know who he is, or ever see his stupid cartoon. You both demonstrate puerility, while believing yourself Righteous,...."
(I am not altogether sure that the author of this substack or Bob do believe themselves to be “Righteous”. They are just describing the world as they see it. You sure seem to think that of yourself though. At least, that is the impression you give. I think the pot needs a colour check, so to speak.)
"Let me ask you - what proof do you have that the State of Israel is not behind the incidents of Oct 7? It's far more likely that they are, than that they are not, but what would you know of these things... You've never been anywhere near those trenches of warfare. ..."
(You ask for proof that Israel is not behind the attacks on 7th October (nice attempt to downplay the severity by calling them 'incidents' by the way), which is kind of funny given your love of logic as stated above. Here, you stray close to a logical fallacy, whereby you assume your proposition is true (“Israel is responsible for the attacks on 7th October”) because the writer has not provided evidence that it is false in her article. I would suggest that the fact Hamas recorded what they did and uploaded it onto the internet, plus the fact that the leadership of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank praised Hamas for what they did, and that Hamas said they wished to repeat it until there were no Jews left tends to indicate where responsibility for the atrocities lies.)
"FTR ...
I thought that you're on the winning side of Freedom, and not the current paradigm of oppressive civilization - Zionism vs Bolshevism. As you demonstrate here, apparently, you're a Zionist. That makes you a Statist. That makes you State first - Freedom last 'uniparty' useful idiot."
(You really should define your terms. What do you think of as freedom, and why do you separate it from civilization, which you describe as oppressive? I wonder how free you would feel if you were old, or frail, or disabled, or very young, in a world without any civilization at all, where 'might is right' gets to rule. So much for being a considerate human being. Or perhaps you share with Rousseau the idea that humanity is really made up of 'noble savages', so all would be well just like that. A strange view for a military man to subscribe to, I must say.)
"Neither Zionism, nor Bolshevism, or any other form of Statism has the power, to render, any of it's practitioners bullet proof and/or above the Law. ...
This Zionism vs Bolshevism paradigm of civilization has come to its inevitable end after 2000 years. DEATH TO ALL TYRANTS... and their lickspittles too."
(Zionism vs Bolshevism paradigm (or pattern) of civilization?! What does that even mean? 2000 years old?!? I'm sure Lenin would be surprised to learn Bolshevism pre-dated him by 1,900 years. What an inaccurate and limited view of the last 2,000 years. No Christianity; no Islam. No Christianity vs Islam; no China, no India etc. etc. Just a narrow little microscopic view of the world that doesn't even focus properly.)
"DE OPPRESSOR LIBER"
(De oppresso liber is the motto of the United States Army Special Forces, which is traditionally believed to mean "to free from oppression" or "to liberate the oppressed" in Latin.013 However, a translation of "to free from oppression" would be "de oppressione liberare." ”
https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/De_oppresso_liber)
It's clear from what you have written, and how you have written it, that you do not have any education in Propositional/Predicate Logic. It is AXIOMATIC of your demonstrably low IQ, middle-school level writing skills.
FTR - All Language operates upon immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic - whether you understand them or not. As your writing demonstrates - you clearly don't. You can take your feeble, religious Logical fallacies, and delusions, and you can choke-to-death on them for all I care.
Do NOT project any of your dimwit delusions or mental-illness into ANYTHING I have written. What I have said is clearly written in Logically certain Propositional Statements…. Anything that you IMAGINE - SpongeBob SquarePants, that is not written by me, originated within YOUR sick, gaslighting mind, you feeble-minded psychopath.
Take your inherently fallacious meathead opinions, and your low IQ Logical fallacies of Language, and shove them ten miles up your ass - where your head clearly resides, sniffing your bigoted smugness.
I am not interested in wasting my time reading anything you have to say, if you cannot write intelligent, Logically certain Propositional Statements, without predicate ambiguity, Logical fallacy, gaslighting projection, bigotry, or sophistry.
1.) I take it that means you can't explain what you said in different words.
2.) I think you could do with some help to resolve your anger issues, since resorting to insults isn't really an argument.
3.) Just because someone disagrees with you, or asks you questions, it doesn't mean they are a psychopath.
3.) You are funny : )
I don't remember asking you a Goddamn thing! You're the nincompoop who got all butthurt after seeing my comment and tried to assert some bizarre non sequitur!
You weirdo - it's your bigoted gaslighting pejoratives, vapid Logical fallacies, and pseudo intellectual nonsense of Logic that make you s psychopath - Karen
You are by definition, the one with an 'axiomatic' anger issue - you're the one who got butthurt not me- Karen. You're the one with delusions of grandeur that you're somehow entitled to "explanation", of your own non sequitur!
Get an education Karen, your imagination of one only proves your arrogant-ignorance. I don't owe you an explanation of anything! The only thing I owe 'you' is my abject contempt! Karen!
For the record - Logically certain Propositional Statements are perfect arguments. Arrogant ignoramus!
Nobody owes you anything Karen! ESAD.
First off - Non sequitur is Logical fallacy. Etymology has fuck-all to do with anything I clearly stated in Propositional Statements!
A Propositional Statement is a Logically certain argument you pathetically delusional pseudo intellectual. "Usage" isn't a fucking Argument! Clearly you're operating on IMAGINATION - Sponge Bob SquarePants.
Silly false comparison/dichotomy, and syllogistic fallacy of Language, are demonstrable Logical fallacy, even if you're to ignorant to comprehend your own stupidity.
FTR SFB - NO, Homosexuals are not “Gay” they're 'Homosexual' ffs - meaning they are ‘sexually attracted to the same sex’. That's Etymology, meathead! The word “Gay” is an example of Bernaysian 'appropriation' of Language. The word “Gay” is SLANG ffs! More specifically it is ‘English’ slang, just like the word “fag” is English slang for a cigarette, as the actual word ‘faggot’ is an English word for a bundle of sticks used to start a fire! That's Etymology ffs!
Moreover, Etymology does not change Logic you arrogantly-ignorant fool! A ‘Linguistic’ reference does not change to an ‘Anthropological’ reference because “Etymology”!
Slang is the vernacular of stupidity, and sciolism is the standard of ignorance in which it exists!
Etymology does not mean the original PROPOSITIONAL definition of a word changes, you halfwit. Language operates on 'immutable' axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic, whether you're capable of comprehending or not.
Language does not operate on opinion! Etymology is a system of LOGIC ffs!
What is demonstrably "stupid" are your arrogantly-ignorant pseudo intellectual comments. That much is axiomatic. Does your breath smell like boot-polish as well?
STOP projecting your mental illness asshole!
Each day I think what passes for humanity on the left cannot farther devolve, it does.
And I was on that side of the aisle, now a cult of Hatred, Violence, Bigotry,CommunoFascist Psychosis and Death
People are picking sides, many are 5th century, inbred fanatics. Many others have no excuse, and their reasoning defies understanding.
Even Helen Keller could hear the cries and see the atrocities committed by Hamas on October 7th, and every day since!
I agree with you Kate.
It was distasteful.
Unfortunately, this take a total miss. Picking sides undermines the very nature of free speech and what constitutes “art” -- all of it will be received from the level of awareness you’re at and how you’ve reconciled your own internal polarity. 👎🏻